2009-04-02                     House Journal                      Page 0702
HB 156                                                                                                                        
The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 1,                                                            
2009, calendar (page 673), was read the third time:                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
    HOUSE BILL NO. 156                                                                                                          
    "An Act relating to municipal fees charged for disposal of waste                                                            
    material from the substantial rehabilitation, renovation,                                                                   
    demolition, removal, or replacement of a structure on deteriorated                                                          
    property."                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 156                                                               
be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering                                                           
Amendment No. 1.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representative Gara:                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Page 2, line 3, following "in the ordinance.":                                                                                  
 Insert "An ordinance may limit the exemption as it applies to                                                                  
deteriorated property to those eligible properties for which the                                                                
exemption is needed to make the project economically feasible as that                                                           
term is defined in the ordinance adopted under this subsection."                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                      
Amendment No. 1 be adopted.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative Lynn objected.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                

2009-04-02                     House Journal                      Page 0703
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?"  The roll                                                              
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
HB 156                                                                                                                          
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 1                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  8   NAYS:  28   EXCUSED:  4   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Buch, Doogan, Gara, Gardner, Holmes, Kawasaki, Kerttula,                                                                 
Tuck                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Edgmon, Fairclough,                                                              
Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Herron, Johansen,                                                                 
Johnson, Joule, Keller, Kelly, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson,                                                             
Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Austerman, Cissna, Foster, Petersen                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
HB 156 was automatically in third reading.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall HB 156 pass the House?"  The roll was                                                               
taken with the following result:                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
HB 156                                                                                                                          
Third Reading                                                                                                                   
Final Passage                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  35   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  4   ABSENT:  1                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Buch, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doogan,                                                                    
Edgmon, Fairclough, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg,                                                                
Harris, Hawker, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller,                                                             
Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Ramras,                                                                   
Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Tuck, Wilson                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Austerman, Cissna, Foster, Petersen                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Absent:  Herron                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
And so, HB 156 passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk                                                             
for engrossment.